Sunday, November 1, 2009

Friendster Falls, Myspace Rises

I read an interesting article that outlines the definition and history of multiple social networking websites that we all know and love. What sparked my interest is how Friendster's marketing choices led to the rise of Myspace. And, more importantly, how self-interest motivated users of Friendster to move into the free and personal world of Myspace. One of the main ways Myspace evolved was through music communities that formed between indie artists and their fans who rapidly found the interests of other fans very much aligned with their own. Essentially, Myspace cater toward users economic self-interest and thus a community began to develop. But before I go into detail, I want to explain the basis for how Myspace was able to be successful.

In 2003, Myspace was launched to compete with Friendster, Xanga, and AsianAvenue. Myspace sought to fulfill the interests of Friendster users by marketing their site as a free tool rather than a fee-based system which is what Friendster was adopting. Another key factor in the move from Friendster to Myspace was the ability to customize one's personal profile. By targeting the interests of the Friendster users by creating a free and fully customizable social networking site, the rapid shift from Friendster to Myspace commenced. What happened here was that the users of Friendster were actually posting messages on where to find cheaper, better sites such as Myspace. Again a direct catering to economic self-interest. What intrigues me is that the indie music sub population that was expelled from Friendster for not complying with the site's policies jump-started Myspace completely, along with the connections between fans based on similar interest.

The indie bands and their fans was a symbiotic relationship that Myspace did not really see coming but opened its arms to as soon as the Myspace population started growing. Local bands around the Los Angeles area (near Santa Monica, CA where Myspace was founded) sought out the economic opportunity of creating fan bases using this new hot and free social networking site. Not only would local fans follow this lead, thousands of other bands and ten of thousands of fans fueled the Myspace fire. The bands and fans dynamic is one that is mutually beneficial, each group having its own interests in mind and as a result creating a community that benefits from these self-interests. Bands could connect to fans and fans could become "Friends" with the bands to feel more connected to them. As this dynamic developed, it also allowed fans to discuss their favorite bands with each other, again highlighting how important this band-fan relationship was for the development of Myspace. But without this dynamic would Myspace even exist today? Surely there can be money poured into the site, but I would think not. The fundamental principle that Myspace is built on is it ability to accommodate the interests of its users and in doing so it creates a symbiotic community that mutually benefits. To be more specific, Myspace also brought in constant change and a diverse set of tools for its users to fulfill their needs--"features".

Myspace also constantly updated its site with new "features" such as the "Myspace Blog". I actually ran a quick search on Google to see how the impact these "features" had on the shift from Friendster to Myspace and guess what popped up? Five different links to Myspace Blogs talking about how much better they liked Myspace.

This of course is the result Myspace wants to see, and the method of using a "me" type interface allowed it to be successful. Also, it success was determined on a few other key factors. One, by becoming a free site, Myspace generated thousands of users that were already using Friendster--the catering to the economic self-interest. Two, band-fan dynamic was a symbiotic relationship that proved how Myspace's catering to its user's self-interest creates a mutually beneficial environment. Third, Myspace constantly created "features" to allow its users to fulfill their interests and needs, which in turn helped everyone as users shared ideas on "Myspace Blog". So Myspace's success was largely drawn from the catering to self-interest, and specifically economic self-interest as the site became free.

5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you did a good job identifying factors that contributed to Myspace’s success. To generalize, I think accessibility, reciprocal interactivity, and unique, innovative features are critical to the success of any social networking website or Web 2.0 application. Some other factors that I can think of are: customizability, visual appeal, security and networking features (like messages, groups, and media-sharing).

    However, I think Myspace is no longer relevant and popular as it had been just few years ago. Advertisements, spammers, and inappropriate contents have frustrated a large number of Myspace users. Currently, a new startup, namely Facebook, has more active users with greater demographic diversity. While Facebook has all the factors that you have mentioned, in addition, its design interface is more intuitive, cleaner and better-looking than that of Myspace. Nevertheless, because IT industry is fast-changing and competitive, what was the new trend one day can quickly become outmoded the next. So we can’t accurately predict whether or not we will be using Facebook several years later. Because Internet users constantly crave for what is better, more convenient, and smarter, online social networking will continue to innovate and evolve. And I believe these efforts will be ultimately beneficial to end users.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Xanga! I used to have a Xanga...

    I am also curious about why you chose to blog about Friendster and Myspace. It's not particularly current, but I suppose you were trying to investigate the history of social networks.

    My favorite part about this post was the discussion on the importance of bands for Myspace. I wouldn't be surprised to find statistics indicating that most traffic and time spent on Myspace is generated by Myspace Music. Look up any band or musician on Google search, and their Myspace page will show up in the top 7 search results almost every time (if not, then at least on the first page of results). The more obscure the band, the higher up the rank their Myspace page will be. To me, that the only bright spot going for Myspace right now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes. The history of the social networks and how self-interest helps the commons in social networking applications even if there are conflicting values.

    As well as identifying sub populations in social networks, and what their role is within the social networks.

    Myspace is one of many that I will be examining.

    ReplyDelete
  5. An interesting bit of history. How does it connect to the later rise of Facebook over Myspace? I didn’t remember that Friendster was fee-based. Certainly the advent of free is a powerful source of change no matter what else is going on. I’m not sure I agree with your repeated use of “pandering” which has a very negative connotation.

    pan·der 1. To act as a go-between or liaison in sexual intrigues; function as a procurer.
    2. To cater to the lower tastes and desires of others or exploit their weaknesses: "He refused to pander to nostalgia and escapism" (New York Times)

    In some sense, all of our economic system is based on the kind of “pandering” you describe.

    ReplyDelete